ContxtIQ · Startup · 2025–Present

ContxtIQ Screening Copilot

A desktop app that sits beside recruiters during live screens. It grades responses, suggests follow-ups, and answers questions in context as the conversation unfolds.

Role

Chief Experience Officer · Full experience lead

Team

Founding team: PD, Eng, Sales

Timeline

2025–Present

Platform

macOS desktop · Live AI assist

From a broad idea to a sharp wedge

ContxtIQ started as a question: what would AI support look like if it actually lived inside a live scenario, not after it? The premise was simple: most AI tools summarize after the fact. We wanted to be present during the moment, where decisions are actually made.

That framing was too broad to ship, so we narrowed: script-based roles where there's a known structure to guide, grade, and extend. Recruiting became our first industry poke because the team had felt the pain firsthand. I'd sat through final-round loops with designers who clearly didn't have the skills they'd claimed; the same story played out with engineers and sales hires. The signal from a screening call wasn't surviving into the interview.

Technical screens, non-technical screeners

Screens exist to catch skill gaps before the loop. But the person screening an engineer or designer is usually a recruiter. They can hear a technical answer without being able to tell whether it's any good. The usual workaround is putting a technical person on the call.

  • Can't grade the answer A recruiter can tell whether a candidate sounded confident, not whether the answer was technically right. The rubric lists topics, not what a strong answer sounds like.
  • Missed follow-ups Knowing what to probe takes domain knowledge. Without it, a vague answer goes unchallenged and claimed experience goes untested.
  • Context stays in the recruiter's head Hiring managers downstream inherit a short summary instead of evidence. Weak signal surfaces as a surprise in round 3.
New session: name the session and select a script template

A copilot that stays in the call with you

ContxtIQ is a desktop app that runs alongside the screening call. The recruiter picks a script template, starts a session, and works through questions one at a time. Behind the scenes, live transcription feeds a reasoning loop that grades answers, suggests follow-ups, and stays open for ad-hoc questions, all scoped to the candidate in front of you.

01

Live response grading

Each answer scored against the script rubric in real time. Reasoning shows in the right rail so the recruiter can see why, not just the number.

02

Generated follow-ups

After marking a question complete, ContxtIQ proposes the probing question a technical interviewer would ask, grounded in what was just said.

03

In-context assistant

"Ask AI assistant" stays open throughout. It's scoped to the candidate, the script, and the session, so every answer arrives with the right context already loaded.

Start a session, work the script, close the loop

The whole product bends around the screening hour. Open the app, pick a template, and run the call. Reasoning and follow-ups assemble themselves as you go.

Welcome screen: name a session and pick a script
01 · Welcome: name a session to begin
New session: name the session and select a script template
02 · New session: name it and pick a script template
Live session: the active question is highlighted while ContxtIQ listens
03 · Script: work through prompts in real time
Evaluated question: score, follow-up and AI rationale
04 · Evaluated: score, rationale and follow-up

Prototype to production, in one hand-off loop

I ran this end-to-end as CXO, not just as a design artifact but all the way into the production repo. The build stayed tight because each stage handed the living prototype forward instead of writing it down on paper.

Step 01 · CXO

Figma Make prototype

I built the first prototype in Figma Make to prove the session → question → grading loop felt right before anyone committed code.

Step 02 · PD

First working stab

Product Development took the prototype and stood up a real desktop application, the first stab at the app that could actually run a session.

Step 03 · CXO

Claude Code on the real repo

Once Claude Code landed, I started building directly against the production repo, pushing PRs to refine interactions, copy, and the grading UI myself instead of handing off specs.

Step 04 · Team

Live design partner

We moved from internal builds to a design partner running real screens. Sessions are being logged live, and the loop we sketched in Figma Make is now producing evidence.

30+

Live sessions logged

2

Recruiters live on product

1

Design-partner company

0→1

End-to-end experience lead

Why it matters

You shouldn't need a technical person to screen for technical skills. With ContxtIQ, any recruiter can.

Sharpen the wedge, then widen it

Near-term: deepen the recruiting experience with the design partner, tighten the grading reasoning, and turn session artifacts into something a hiring manager can actually pick up. Further out: the same live-copilot pattern extends to any script-based role with a structured conversation and a signal worth preserving, like sales discovery, support triage, or clinical intake.